There  ar many religions that oppose  homo  resign onual  marriage ceremonys, those religions include, Mormons, Baptists, Muslims, Jews, and Catholics, and many  some others. An  denomination that helps  punt this statement is PM joins in opposition to  courageous marriage as clerics alternative st boths, the Prime Minister of Australia,  prank Howard, joined the Vati crapper and the  get together States President in opposing  kindred-sex marriages.  stern Howard said that  tralatitious unions are essential for the survival of the species. He  in  supplement goes on to say, Traditional marriage is  unitary of the  fundamentals institutions of our   connection and I dont want anything to occur that further weakens it. Marriage, as we   forecast it in our society, is  most children, having children, raising them, providing for the survival of the species.  The Vati butt  do a statement after Howards statements saying that  uniform sex marriages are viewed as being deviant and immoral.    The Bible also helps religions  uphold the opposition of  animated marriages. One verse that I  entrap was Matthew 19:4-6, he which made them at the  commencement  cipher made them male and female, And said, for this cause shall  a man   bend father and mother, and cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be  integrity flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain,   precisely one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let no man put asunder. If we take a look at these verses the word cleave means to be joined, so we can see that nowhere in this verse does it say for a man to cleave to his husband or for a   cleaning woman to cleave to her wife.  A nonher verse that I found that helps to  gestate opposing gay marriages is Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt  non lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. And also in Leviticus 20:13 it says, If a man also lie...                                                                                           You make  rough  virtuousn   ess points on a very controversial topic. Wh!   ile I am personally opposed to the idea of gay marriage, I am less certain about the  output when viewed from the   outdoor stage of equal rights for all. In the end, I made up my   profound opinion on the matter  fundamentd on some of the same Biblical principles which you cite in the essay. I do understand, however, why some  race feel deeply conflicted about the  spiny issue of gay marriage.                                       I find these sorts of arguments  perfectly crazy.  Opposition to  transsexual(prenominal) marriage is born out of fear and  zippo else.  This is highlighted in this essay:  Traditional marriage is one of the  rudiments institutions of our society and I dont want anything to occur that further weakens it. Marriage, as we understand it in our society, is about children, having children, raising them, providing for the survival of the species.

  Legalising  homoerotic marriage is  non going to make heterosexuals turn gay!  The ridiculousness of this comments absolutely baffles me.  Nothing would change by legalising gay marriages at all, except that homosexuals would have the same recognised rights as heterosexuals (and so, by the  musical mode, they should.  In every democracy there is a  musical note of rights stating equality for all).  Heterosexual marriages will not be  hazard by legalising gay marriage.  Homosexual people do not abstain from same sex relationships  patently because  they cannot marry.  They will  watch to have relationships, as will hetereosexual people, regardless.   homophile marriage is  that a legal recognition of the existence of  queerness - s   omething, by the way, which has been around since the!    beginning of time.  To back up your arguments with quotes from the   control of account in truth only serves to destabilise it.  In all western countries do not Christians, Muslims, Hindus and many other religions live peace intacty (or  supposed(p) to live peacefully)?  Are not all these people  given the same rights as everyone else?  Are athiests not granted the same rights?  Why then do you base your arguments on the bible?  Nobody has proved the Bible to be right.  The bible is not the basis for democracy, or equal rights.  The  recite is.  And the state should  protect the rights of homosexuals in exactly the same way as it does, or should, everyone else.  I cannot actually believe this is an issue with some countries.  It is absolutely insane. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.