Sunday, October 20, 2013

Why Was The Old Poor Law Reformed In 1834 And Why

In this essay, we will demonstrate why the Old good-for-naught Law was reformed in 1834. We will also dispute why the New Law was easily passed. Firstly, we will sheet the reasons why the Old forgetful Law of 1834 was reformed. Secondly, we will nitty-gritty the reasons why the New Law was easily passed. The Old nearsighted Law of 1834 was reformed because it could not cope due to the broad numbers of people claiming poor relief. This was due to population rise, commercialization of farming which left people with no jobs, decline of plain-spoken crafts, harvest failures, food shortages due to war, higher food prices and alternate in attitude to claiming social welfare as thither was no stigma attached to being poor anymore. This administer to different measures such as the introduction of the Speenhamland system of 1795. Having investigated the reasons for the refilling of the shortsighted Law, we will now focus on the reasons that exit to the reform. The re were cardinal main reasons that led to the old Poor Law Reform to easily pass which were: a supernumerary government, Tories were a minority, Climate change, objectors were not listened to, and a Report refer on evidence collected by the commission of enquiry. However, out(a) of the six reasons, we will discuss only two of the reasons which were; a impulsive Government and the fact that the Tories were a minority.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The Government cherished to cut out what it was paying out to the poor hence get dressed-up up a Commission of Enquiry which produced a hide. The results of the shroud had detrimental effects to the poor. As the results of this report were very significant! , leash important changes to the law were made; centralisation, less eligibility, and the workhouse test which gripe for everyone in receipt of poor relief to enter the workhouse, disregarding of individual circumstances. Blaug M, (cited in Murray 2004 p.23) criticised the way the investigation was conducted name it wildly unstatistical due to the accuracy of the picture it painted. Ambiguous questions were asked...If you intrust to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.